The finance calculator is where a shopper turns a car into a monthly payment. When the calculator shows the exact vehicle being financed, the payment stays connected to the thing being bought, and abandonment tells you so.
The same lookup follows the deal through its paperwork.
The vehicle appears beside the payment scenarios while the shopper is still deciding.
The offer document shows the financed vehicle in print quality, trim and colour correct.
The asset is visible in the case file, which keeps referrals concrete.
The agreement carries the vehicle it finances, and archived copies stay complete through your cache.
Calculator, quote, case file and contract, all showing the same correct vehicle.
Lending through intermediaries means your offer renders in someone else's interface. Providing the image URL with the offer keeps the asset visible wherever the deal travels, in a look you control rather than whatever the portal found.
Bring vehicle imagery into your product without the heavy lifting. Clear docs, open SDKs and ready-made plugins connect to your stack in minutes, and our status page shows you live how the API is doing.
Collections, remarketing and audit all open the case file years after origination. A cached image of the financed vehicle, stored at contract time, keeps the file complete when the questions arrive.
Our point of sale calculator finally shows the car the customer is financing. Completion went up, and the contract file has the asset in it, which audit noticed before we did.
Usually from the deal itself: the dealer's system, the application form or the broker payload. Wherever it enters, that is where the image resolves, with no extra data collection.
Yes. Make, model, year and trim resolve too, which covers pre order and build to order financing, and the VIN takes over once the car exists.
Yes, explicitly: quotes, agreements, statements and archived copies. That is the clause your legal team will look for first, and it is written to be found.
Your API response to the merchant can carry the image URL alongside the offer, so the vehicle renders in the merchant's checkout with no extra integration on their side.
No. The lookup uses vehicle identifiers only, so the image pipeline stays entirely outside your personal data flows.
The cached catalogue image gives remarketing a clean starting visual immediately, while condition photos follow from inspection. Listings go live days earlier.
Auto finance is the business of attaching numbers to cars, and its interfaces are strangely car free. Calculators, quotes and contracts describe the vehicle in a specification line and illustrate it with nothing, because photography never fit the flow. The absence is invisible until you fix it, at which point completion metrics explain what it was costing.
The point of sale calculator is where the emotional purchase meets the rational payment, and it is the step where deals quietly die. Keeping the exact vehicle on screen through the payment scenarios holds the two halves together: the shopper is configuring a way to get the car, not contemplating a loan in the abstract. Lenders that test this rarely test their way back.
Like insurers, lenders eventually face the question of where their vehicle images come from. Rendered imagery answers it with one rights holder and a licence written for financial documents, which turns a compliance risk into a closed item. The picture that helps sell the loan is also the one your audit trail can explain.
The integration is the same VIN lookup at every step, which is why finance teams usually ship this in one sprint against the surface they care about most and let the rest follow.
Tell us where the images should appear, from calculator to contract. You get images for your VINs and the licence text for financial documents.
